The Bias-Debt Audit Template is a comprehensive Excel workbook designed to help you detect, measure, and address algorithmic bias in your marketing automation systems before it costs you customers and revenue.
This template contains 7 tabs:
- Calculator with ROI: Set precision targets and calculate MRI thresholds (START HERE FIRST)
- Quick 30-Min Audit: Fast diagnostic with MRI + z-test statistical validation
- Full Framework Tracker: Track your 5-step audit process
- Revenue Impact Calculator: Quantify the business cost of bias
- Bias Pattern Log: Document and track bias issues over time
- Example Data: Real-world scenario showing statistical significance testing
- Credits: Creation instructions and link to instructions
Getting Started (First 5 Minutes)
Step 1: Download and Open
- Download the Excel template and save the file as: BiasDebtAudit_[YourCompany]_[Date].xlsx
- Open in Microsoft Excel, Google Sheets, or compatible spreadsheet software
- Enable editing if prompted
Step 2: Set Up Your Calculator (REQUIRED FIRST STEP) Before using any other tabs, you MUST configure Tab 0: Calculator with ROI
This tab:
- Calculates dynamic MRI thresholds for each segment
- Determines minimum sample sizes needed
- Shows business impact (cost, timeline, ROI)
- Auto-populates values used in Quick 30-Min Audit
Takes 5 minutes to configure. Without this step, the Quick Audit won’t work properly.
Step 3: Choose Your Next Step
If you need results TODAY: → Start with Tab 1: Calculator with ROI
If you want comprehensive framework: → Start with Tab 3: Full Framework Tracker
If you need to justify the investment: → Start with Tab 4: Revenue Impact Calculator
Tab 1: Calculator with ROI
Purpose Configure your business parameters and statistical precision targets. This tab calculates the dynamic MRI thresholds and minimum sample sizes that auto-populate in the Quick 30-Min Audit tab.
⚠️ IMPORTANT: You MUST complete this tab BEFORE using the Quick 30-Min Audit tab.
How to Use
Section 1: Your Business Metrics
Enter three key inputs:
Cost Per Conversion (CPA): (Cell B5)
- How much you pay to acquire one conversion
- Example: $50
- Find this: Total ad spend ÷ Total conversions
Average Customer Value (LTV): (Cell B6)
- Revenue per customer (lifetime value or first purchase)
- Example: $1,200
- Find this: Total revenue ÷ Total customers
Current Monthly Conversions: (Cell B7)
- Your typical monthly conversion volume
- Example: 500 conversions/month
- Find this: Average conversions over last 3 months
What Auto-Calculates:
- Current Monthly Ad Spend (Cell B8): Automatically calculated from CPA × conversions
Section 2: Statistical Precision Target
Desired Margin of Error: (Cell B11)
- Default: ±2% (recommended for most businesses)
- This determines how precise your bias detection will be
- Smaller margin = more precision but requires more samples
What This Means:
- ±1%: Very high precision (expensive, ~9,600 samples needed)
- ±2%: High precision (recommended, ~2,400 samples needed)
- ±3%: Moderate precision (faster, ~1,100 samples needed)
- ±5%: Basic precision (cheapest, ~400 samples needed)
Confidence Level: (Cell B12)
- Default: 95% (standard, don’t change unless advised)
- This is the statistical confidence level for all calculations
Section 3: Enter Sample Size (REQUIRED)
Cell B15: Actual Sample Size
Before moving to Section 3, you must enter your sample size:
- Enter the total number of conversions in your analysis (e.g., 1000)
- This is the denominator for the percentages you’ll enter in Column C
- Example: If analyzing 1,000 conversions where 50 were Ages 18-24, enter 1000 here
- This value flows to Tab 1 Column E automatically
Location: Row 15, Column B
Why this matters: Without this value, the statistical significance tests in Tab 1 won’t work.
Section 4: Segment Analysis with MRI Thresholds
Update Your TAM %: (Column B, Rows 20-24)
- Enter your target market demographics
- Must total 100%
- These are the same values you’ll use in Quick audit
Example:
- Ages 18-24: 5%
- Ages 25-34: 20%
- Ages 35-50: 50%
- Ages 51-65: 20%
- Ages 65+: 5%
Section 4 Column Layout Reference:
| Column | Field Name | Type | Description | 
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Demographic Segment | Label | Age group or segment name | 
| B | TAM % | USER INPUT | Your target market percentage | 
| C | Actual Conversions % | USER INPUT | Actual performance data | 
| D | Min Sample Needed | Auto-calculated | Required sample size | 
| E | Warning MRI Min | Auto-calculated | Stricter lower threshold (99% CI) | 
| F | Healthy MRI Min | Auto-calculated | Normal lower threshold (95% CI) | 
| G | Healthy MRI Max | Auto-calculated | Normal upper threshold (95% CI) | 
| H | Warning MRI Max | Auto-calculated | Stricter upper threshold (99% CI) | 
| I | Expected Revenue | Auto-calculated | Segment revenue potential | 
Important: Only edit columns B and C in this section. Enter your TAM % in Column B and your Actual Conversions % in Column C. All other columns (D-I) contain formulas and will auto-calculate.
Data Entry Workflow:
- Enter TAM % in Column B (must total 100%)
- Enter Actual Sample Size in Cell B15 (row 15, above this section)
- Enter Actual Conversions % in Column C (must total 100%)
- Review auto-calculated MRI thresholds in Columns D-I
- Proceed to Tab 1 to see statistical analysis
What Auto-Calculates for Each Segment:
- Min Sample Needed (Column D): How many conversions needed to detect MRI 0.85 with 80% power
- Warning MRI Min (Column E): Lower warning threshold (99% CI) - stricter boundary
- Healthy MRI Min (Column F): Lower bound of acceptable range (95% CI)
- Healthy MRI Max (Column G): Upper bound of acceptable range (95% CI)
- Warning MRI Max (Column H): Upper warning threshold (99% CI) - stricter boundary
- Expected Revenue (Column I): Revenue potential for this segment
Note: Warning thresholds (99% CI) are stricter than Healthy thresholds (95% CI). The spreadsheet displays Warning columns before Healthy columns.
Key Insight: These thresholds are DYNAMIC
- Smaller segments (5%) have wider acceptable ranges (e.g., 0.60-1.40)
- Larger segments (50%) have tighter ranges (e.g., 0.96-1.04)
- This is statistically correct—small segments naturally vary more
Section 5: Cost & Timeline Analysis
This section auto-calculates based on your inputs:
Samples Needed: (Row 29)
- Maximum sample size needed across all segments
- Use this as your target for audits
Cost to Acquire Samples: (Row 30)
- Total ad spend needed: Samples × CPA
- Example: 2,401 samples × $50 = $120,050
Time to Collect: (Row 31)
- How long at current pace: Samples ÷ Monthly Conversions
- Example: 2,401 ÷ 500 = 4.8 months
Monthly Ad Spend Required: (Row 32)
- Average monthly spend needed
- Compared to your current spend (Row 33)
Section 5: Revenue Impact of Missing Bias
Shows real scenarios: What happens if you MISS bias in a 20% segment?
Example scenarios shown:
- Severe bias (MRI 0.50): Lose $720,000/year
- Critical bias (MRI 0.70): Lose $432,000/year
- Moderate bias (MRI 0.85): Lose $216,000/year
- Mild bias (MRI 0.95): Lose $72,000/year
Key Question: “Would You Detect It?” column shows whether your sample size will catch each level of bias.
Section 6: Compare Precision Levels
Shows tradeoffs between precision, cost, and sensitivity:
| Precision | MOE | Sample | Cost | Time | ROI | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very High | ±1% | 9,604 | High | 19 mo | 0.5x ❌ | 
| High | ±2% | 2,401 | Medium | 5 mo | 1.8x ✅ | 
| Moderate | ±3% | 1,068 | Low | 2 mo | 4.0x 💰 | 
| Basic | ±5% | 384 | Very Low | 1 mo | 11.3x 🤔 | 
Use this to decide: Should I increase/decrease precision based on budget and timeline?
Section 7: Automated Recommendations
Based on your inputs, shows:
- Target sample size
- Total cost to acquire
- Time to collect
- ROI analysis
- Decision framework
Example output: “✅ You can complete an audit quarterly (ideal frequency)” or “⚠️ Consider increasing ad spend to $30,000/mo to collect samples faster”
What to Do After Configuring
Once you’ve entered your business metrics and TAM %:
- Review the “Max Sample Needed” (Row 25, Column C)
- Check the “Cost & Timeline” section (Rows 24-30)
- Decide if you need to adjust precision (Cell B11) based on budget/timeline
- Note your MRI thresholds (these will auto-populate in Quick Audit)
- Proceed to Tab 2: Quick 30-Min Audit
⚠️ CRITICAL: Any changes to the Calculator tab will automatically update the Quick Audit tab. If you modify TAM % or precision, the Quick Audit thresholds will recalculate.
Tab 2: Quick 30-Min Audit
Purpose Quickly identify if your marketing automation has bias issues and which segments are affected.
⚠️ PREREQUISITE: You MUST complete Tab 0: Calculator with ROI BEFORE using this tab, including:
- Business metrics (B5-B7): CPA, LTV, Monthly Conversions
- Statistical precision (B11-B12): Margin of error and confidence level
- Actual Sample Size (B15): Total conversions analyzed ← REQUIRED
- TAM % (Column B, Rows 20-24): Your target market breakdown
- Actual Conversions % (Column C, Rows 20-24): Your actual performance ← REQUIRED
The calculator auto-populates the MRI thresholds and minimum sample sizes used in this tab. All values in Tab 1 flow automatically from Tab 0 – you do not enter data directly in Tab 1.
How to Use
Step 1: Verify All Auto-Populated Data
Before reviewing results, confirm all columns have data:
- Column A: Demographic segments (from Calculator A20-A24)
- Column B: TAM % (from Calculator B20-B24)
- Column C: Actual Conversions % (from Calculator C20-C24)
- Column D: Min Sample Size Needed (from Calculator D20-D24)
- Column E: Actual Sample Size (from Calculator B15)
If any columns are blank or show #REF errors:
- Return to Tab 0 (Calculator)
- Verify you entered data in B15, Column B, and Column C
- Refresh this tab (F9 in Excel, or close/reopen in Google Sheets)
- These values are auto-populated from the Calculator tab
- Should match the TAM % you entered in Calculator (Column B, Rows 20-24)
- DO NOT manually edit these values—change them in the Calculator tab instead
- Ensure total = 100%
Note: If you need to change demographic segments, do it in the Calculator tab and the changes will flow here automatically.
Example
- Ages 18-24: 15%
- Ages 25-34: 30%
- Ages 35-50: 35%
- Ages 51-65: 15%
- Ages 65+: 5%
The spreadsheet is already populated with these age ranges as segments. Replace them with whatever you want (age, gender, etc. or combinations thereof). It’s intentionally simplistic.
Resources for TAM data
- U.S. Census Bureau
- Pew Research
- Industry associations
- Your market sizing documentation
Step 2: Verify Auto-Populated Data
⚠️ IMPORTANT: All data in Tab 1 auto-populates from the Calculator tab. Do not manually edit columns B, C, D, or E in this tab. If you need to change values, go back to Calculator tab.
Column B: Your TAM %
- Auto-populates from Calculator tab Column B (Rows 20-24)
- Should match your target market breakdown
- If incorrect, update in Calculator tab (not here)
Column C: Actual Conversions %
- Auto-populates from Calculator tab Column C (Rows 20-24)
- Should show your actual conversion performance by demographic
- If incorrect, update in Calculator tab (not here)
- Total should equal 100%
Column D: Min Sample Size Needed
- Auto-populates from Calculator tab Column D
- Shows minimum samples needed to detect moderate bias (MRI 0.85)
Column E: Actual Sample Size
- Auto-populates from Calculator tab Cell B15
- Shows the same value for all rows (this is correct)
- If incorrect, update Calculator tab B15 (not here)
Where to find conversion data (for entering in Calculator tab Column C):
- Google Ads: Reports → Audience → Demographics
- Meta Ads: Ads Manager → Reports → Demographics
- HubSpot: Contacts → Analyze → Create Custom Report
- Salesforce: Reports → Create New Report → Opportunities by Demographics
Step 3: Review Auto-Calculated Results
The template automatically calculates and compares your performance against dynamic thresholds:
Column D: Min Sample Size Needed
- Auto-populated from Calculator tab
- Shows samples needed to detect MRI 0.85 with 80% statistical power
- Compare this to Column E (your actual sample size)
- If Column E < Column D: You may miss moderate bias (MRI 0.85-1.00)
- If Column E ≥ Column D: You have adequate power to detect meaningful bias
Column F: MRI Score (Market Representation Index)
- Formula: (Actual Conversions %) ÷ (TAM %)
- Auto-calculated from your data in Columns B and C
- Interpretation:
- MRI = 1.00: Perfect alignment (actual matches target exactly)
- MRI < 1.00: Under-represented (getting fewer conversions than expected)
- MRI > 1.00: Over-represented (getting more conversions than expected)
 
Columns G-J: Dynamic MRI Thresholds
- Auto-populated from Calculator tab based on your TAM % and precision settings
- These adapt to each segment’s size (not fixed values like 0.85-1.15)
Column G: Warning MRI Min (99% CI)
- Values below this are critically under-represented
Column H: Healthy MRI Min (95% CI)
- Lower bound of acceptable range
- MRI between H and I = Healthy (if statistically significant)
Column I: Healthy MRI Max (95% CI)
- Upper bound of acceptable range
- MRI between H and I = Healthy (if statistically significant)
Column J: Warning MRI Max (99% CI)
- Values above this are critically over-represented
Example Thresholds (vary by segment):
- 5% TAM segment: Healthy range 0.60-1.40 (wide range)
- 20% TAM segment: Healthy range 0.90-1.10 (moderate)
- 50% TAM segment: Healthy range 0.96-1.04 (narrow range)
Why different ranges? Smaller segments naturally have more random variation. The calculator accounts for this statistically.
Column K: Z-Score
- Measures how many standard deviations your actual % is from expected TAM %
- Formula: z = (Actual% – TAM%) / √(TAM% × (1-TAM%) / Sample Size)
- Interpretation:
- |z| < 1.96: Within normal variation
- |z| ≥ 1.96: Statistically significant deviation (p < 0.05)
- |z| ≥ 2.576: Highly significant deviation (p < 0.01)
 
Column L: P-Value
- Probability that this result could occur by random chance
- Formula: p = 2 × (1 – NORM.S.DIST(|z|, TRUE))
- Interpretation:
- p ≥ 0.05: Not statistically significant (may be random variation)
- p < 0.05: Statistically significant (likely real bias)
- p < 0.01: Highly significant (definitely real bias)
 
Column M: Stat Sig? (Statistical Significance)
- “Yes” if P-Value < 0.05 (statistically significant)
- “No” if P-Value ≥ 0.05 (not statistically significant)
⚠️ IMPORTANT: “No” means NO BIAS DETECTED—this is GOOD, not bad!
- “Not significant” = the deviation is within normal random variation
- Only act on segments where this says “Yes”
Column N: Status
- Auto-assigns based on BOTH MRI thresholds AND statistical significance
- Logic:
- If MRI outside columns G or J AND Stat Sig = Yes → 🚨 Critical
- If MRI outside columns H-I but within G-J AND Stat Sig = Yes → ⚠️ Warning
- All other cases → ✅ Healthy
 
CRITICAL: Status requires BOTH conditions:
- MRI outside healthy range (columns H-I), AND
- Statistically significant (p < 0.05)
If MRI is outside range but p ≥ 0.05, status shows “✅ Healthy” because the deviation is not confirmed as real bias.
Understanding the Sample Size Paradox
You may notice counterintuitive patterns:
- Actual sample > Min sample needed → “Not statistically significant”
- Actual sample < Min sample needed → “Statistically significant”
This seems backwards but is statistically correct. Here’s why:
“Min Sample Size Needed” (Column D) answers: “How many samples to reliably detect MRI 0.85 IF it exists?”
“Stat Sig?” (Column M) answers: “Is my ACTUAL deviation statistically significant?”
These are different questions!
Real Examples:
Example 1: Zero Deviation
- TAM: 5% → Actual: 5.0% (MRI = 1.00)
- Min Sample Needed: 457
- Actual Sample: 1,000 ✓ (have enough!)
- Stat Sig?: No
- Why? There’s ZERO deviation. Even with 1 million samples, this would be “not significant” because there’s nothing to detect. This is perfect alignment!
Example 2: Small Deviation (Smaller than MRI 0.85 target)
- TAM: 5% → Actual: 6.0% (MRI = 1.20)
- Min Sample Needed: 457 (to detect MRI 0.85)
- Actual Sample: 1,000 ✓ (have enough for MRI 0.85!)
- Stat Sig?: No (P-Value = 0.15)
- Why? The 1% deviation is SMALLER than the 2.5% deviation (MRI 0.85) the calculator was designed to detect. You’d need ~5,000+ samples to reliably catch such a small deviation. Having 1,000 samples is enough to catch MRI 0.85 but NOT enough to catch MRI 1.20.
Example 3: Large Deviation (Larger than MRI 0.85 target)
- TAM: 20% → Actual: 30.0% (MRI = 1.50)
- Min Sample Needed: 1,537 (to detect MRI 0.85)
- Actual Sample: 1,000 ✗ (need more for MRI 0.85)
- Stat Sig?: Yes (P-Value ≈ 0)
- Why? The 10% deviation is so HUGE (MRI 1.50 >> MRI 0.85) it’s obvious even with fewer samples. Z-score = 7.91 (way beyond 1.96 threshold). It’s like using binoculars to spot an elephant—you don’t need full zoom.
The Pattern:
| Deviation Size | Sample Needed | Can Detect With Less? | 
|---|---|---|
| Zero (MRI 1.00) | ∞ | ❌ No – nothing to detect | 
| Tiny (MRI 1.05) | ~20,000 | ❌ No – too subtle | 
| Small (MRI 1.20) | ~5,000 | ❌ Barely | 
| Moderate (MRI 0.85) | ~1,500 | ⚠️ As designed | 
| Large (MRI 1.50) | ~400 | ✅ Yes – obvious! | 
| Huge (MRI 0.68) | ~100 | ✅ Yes – unmistakable! | 
Key Takeaway:
- Having MORE samples than needed doesn’t create significance when deviation is small or zero
- Having FEWER samples than needed can still detect significance when deviation is huge
- Only act on deviations with “Stat Sig? = Yes” (p < 0.05)
Step 4: Review Summary Metrics
Scroll down (below your data rows) to see auto-calculated summary:
- Segments in Critical Status: Count of 🚨 Critical segments
- Segments in Warning Status: Count of ⚠️ Warning segments
- Segments Healthy: Count of ✅ Healthy segments
- Statistically Significant Issues: Count where p < 0.05
Key Insight: Only act on segments where BOTH:
- MRI is outside healthy thresholds (Columns H-I), AND
- P-Value < 0.05 (Column L shows “Yes” in Column M)
This combination identifies true bias vs. normal market variation.
Common Patterns and What They Mean:
Pattern 1: MRI outside range + Stat Sig Yes → 🚨 Real bias detected—take action immediately → Example: MRI 0.68, p < 0.001
Pattern 2: MRI outside range + Stat Sig No → ✅ Likely normal variation—monitor but don’t act yet → Example: MRI 1.20, p = 0.15 → Consider increasing sample size if this pattern persists
Pattern 3: MRI = 1.00 + Stat Sig No → ✅ Perfect alignment—no bias → Example: MRI 1.00, p = 1.0
Pattern 4: Sample size < Min needed + Stat Sig No → ⚠️ Might be missing moderate bias (MRI 0.85-1.15) → Action: Collect more data until you reach “Min Sample Size Needed”
Step 5: Document Findings
Column O: Notes
- Add context about why bias might exist
- Note which tools/campaigns might be responsible
- Flag for follow-up investigation
- Document any changes made to Calculator settings
Column P: Date Checked
- Auto-populates with today’s date
- Update quarterly to track progress
- Update whenever you change Calculator settings and re-run audit
What to Do With Results
🚨If you found Critical bias patterns (MRI <0.70 or >1.30) WITH P-Value <0.05
Statistically confirmed bias—immediate action required
- Proceed immediately to Tab 4 (Bias Pattern Log) to document
- Identify which tools are causing the exclusion (see article Section 1-4)
- Calculate revenue impact in Tab 3
- Implement fixes within 48 hours
⚠️If you found Warning patterns (MRI 0.70-0.84 or 1.16-1.30)
Check P-Value: If <0.05, treat as high priority
- If P-Value ≥0.05, monitor but may be normal variation
- Schedule deeper audit within 30 days if statistically significant
- Document in Tab 4 for tracking
ℹ️If MRI is low BUT P-Value >0.05
May be random variation, not systematic bias
- Increase sample size and re-test
- Monitor quarterly to see if pattern persists
✅If all segments are Healthy
- Great! Schedule quarterly re-audit
- Still complete Tab 2 for ongoing monitoring
- Consider auditing additional channels
Tab 3: Full Framework Tracker
Purpose
Implement the complete 5-step Bias-Debt Framework™ across your marketing stack.
The 5 Steps
1️⃣ MAP (Target: 2 hours)
- Document all data sources feeding your AI (CRM, ad platforms, analytics)
- Create data lineage diagram: CRM → Audience Builder → Ad Platform → Results
- Note data age, scope, and collection method
- Red flag: Any data older than 3 years without refresh
2️⃣ MEASURE (Target: 30 min per channel, quarterly)
- Run MRI (Market Representation Index) + z-test audit from Tab 1
- Compare distributions to TAM using statistical tests
- Document gaps with p-values < 0.05 (statistically significant)
- Red flag: Any segment with MRI <0.70 or >1.30 AND p-value <0.05 (statistically confirmed bias)
3️⃣ MONITOR (Target: 1 hour initial, 15 min monthly)
- Document what KPIs your algorithms optimize for
- Check if KPIs reward diversity or narrow focus
- Set up automated alerts when segments drop below 80% of TAM
- Red flag: KPIs that reward short-term efficiency without representation constraints
4️⃣ MITIGATE (Target: 3-5 hours per campaign correction)
- Inject balancing data or diversity constraints
- Add manual overrides for underserved segments
- Retrain models with balanced data
- Red flag: Team resistance (“but the algorithm knows best”)
5️⃣ MAINTAIN (Target: 4 hours quarterly)
- Schedule recurring bias audits (add to calendar)
- Assign clear ownership (name responsible person)
- Require executive review of results
- Red flag: Going >6 months without an audit
How to Use This Tab
For Each Task:
- Status Column: Select from dropdown
- Not Started
- In Progress
- Completed
- Blocked (explain in Notes)
- Skipped (explain why)
 
- Date Started/Completed: Track timing
- Hours Spent: Log actual time investment
- Use for future planning
- Share with leadership to justify resources
 
- Owner: Assign responsible person
- Notes: Add specifics
- Blockers encountered
- Decisions made
- Next actions
 
Review Progress Summary
Bottom section auto-calculates:
- Total tasks completed
- Completion percentage
- Total hours invested
Tip: Review this tab in weekly team meetings. Make bias audits a standing agenda item alongside performance reviews.
Tab 4: Revenue Impact Calculator
Purpose
Quantify the business case for bias correction by calculating revenue at risk from excluded market segments.
How to Use
Section A: Market Size
- Total Addressable Market: Total number of potential customers annually
- Average Customer Value: Lifetime value or annual contract value
- Total Market Opportunity: Auto-calculates (TAM × Avg Value)
Example:
- TAM: 10,000 potential customers
- Avg Value: $1,200
- Opportunity: $12,000,000
Section B: Current Performance
- Current Annual Conversions: Total conversions last 12 months
- Current Conversion Rate: Auto-calculates
- Current Annual Revenue: Auto-calculates
Section C: Bias Analysis
- Under-Represented Segment % of TAM: From Quick Audit (Tab 1). Enter the expected TAM percentage for the under-represented segment.
- Example: If ages 51+ = 30% of TAM but you’re only reaching 12%, enter 30% here.
- Note: Only include segments where p-value <0.05 (statistically confirmed bias).
- P-Value from Z-Test: Enter from Tab 1 This validates that the bias is statistically significant Only calculate revenue impact for segments with p-value <0.05 Random market variations won’t produce reliable projections .
- Example: If p-value = 0.001, this segment’s under-representation is highly significant.
 
- Current Coverage of This Segment: Actual performance
- Example: Enter 12%
 
- Gap: Auto-calculates difference (18% in this example)
Section D: Revenue Impact
The calculator estimates:
- Potential Additional Customers: If you closed the gap
- Conservative Capture Rate: Assumes you can capture 25% of the gap
- Potential Additional Revenue: Annual opportunity
- ANNUAL REVENUE AT RISK: Total potential revenue being lost
This number is your business case for investing in bias correction.
Scenario Analysis Table
Shows three scenarios for correcting bias:
- Conservative (25% of gap): Modest improvements
- Moderate (50% of gap): Balanced approach
- Aggressive (75% of gap): Comprehensive fixes
Each scenario calculates:
- Coverage improvement
- Estimated additional revenue
- Implementation cost (you can edit this)
- Net benefit
- ROI
How to use: Show this to leadership to justify bias audit investment. Even conservative scenarios typically show 5-10x ROI.
Tab 5: Bias Pattern Log
Purpose
Maintain a running log of all bias patterns discovered, fixes applied, and outcomes tracked.
How to Use
For Each Bias Pattern You Discover:
- Date: When bias was identified
- Channel/Tool: Which system showed the bias
- Examples: Google Ads, HubSpot, Email Platform
 
- Bias Type: Select from dropdown
- Automation Bias
- Data Representation Bias
- Confirmation Bias Loop
- Survivorship Bias
- Other
 
- Affected Segment: Which demographic or group
- MRI Score: From your Quick Audit (Market Representation Index)
- P-Value: Statistical significance (from Tab 1)
- Description: What’s happening
- Example: “Older demographics excluded from Performance Max campaigns (MRI: 0.40, p<0.001)”
 
- Root Cause: Why it’s happening
- Example: “Lookalike trained on young-skewing converters”
 
- Fix Applied: What you did to correct it
- Example: “Added age-diverse audience signals”
 
- Status: Select from dropdown
- Identified
- Investigating
- Fix in Progress
- Fixed
- Monitoring (post-fix)
- Closed
 
- Follow-Up Date: When to re-check (typically 30 days)
Summary Metrics
Auto-calculates:
- Total biases identified
- Currently active issues
- Fixed and monitoring
- Closed cases
Tip: Review this log in monthly leadership meetings. Track pattern trends—if you keep finding the same type of bias, you have a systemic issue.
Tab 6: Example Data
Purpose
See a real-world scenario showing how bias manifests and how to interpret results.
The Scenario
B2B SaaS company selling project management software discovers their algorithms strongly favor mid-size companies at the expense of small businesses.
What to Learn
Review the data:
- Notice how MRI scores reveal the problem
- See how z-test confirms statistical significance
- Understand how p-values distinguish true bias from random variation
- Review the revenue impact calculation for confirmed bias patterns
Read the analysis:
- Likely root causes identified
- Recommended fixes listed
- Implementation priority suggested
Use this as a template:
- Your bias patterns will look similar
- Apply the same diagnostic approach
- Adapt the fixes to your context
Best Practices
Frequency
- Quick Audit (Tab 1): Monthly for high-spend channels, quarterly for others
- Full Framework (Tab 2): Quarterly deep dive
- Revenue Calculator (Tab 3): When bias is discovered, annually for planning
- Bias Log (Tab 4): Log immediately when bias is found, review monthly
Team Roles
Who should use this template:
- Marketing Ops Lead (primary owner)
- Demand Gen Manager (contributor)
- Analytics/Data Team (data provider)
- CMO/Leadership (reviewer)
Assign clear ownership:
- One person responsible for keeping template updated
- Calendar recurring audits (treat like financial close)
- Include in performance reviews
Integration with Existing Tools
Export data from:
- Google Ads → Reports → Download
- Meta Ads → Ads Manager → Export
- HubSpot → Contacts → Export
- Salesforce → Reports → Export
Import into Tab 1:
- Summarize demographic breakdowns
- Calculate percentages
- Enter into template
When to Update
✅ Update immediately when:
- You discover a new bias pattern
- You implement a fix
- You complete a framework step
- Monthly at minimum
✅ Full re-audit when:
- Quarterly (scheduled)
- After major campaign changes
- When switching tools/platforms
- If performance drops unexpectedly
Troubleshooting
“My totals don’t add to 100%”
Solution: Check your TAM percentages and Actual Conversions percentages. Each should sum to 100%. If actual conversions don’t sum to 100%, you may have uncategorized data—check your source data.
“I don’t have demographic data”
Solution:
- Enable demographic tracking in your ad platforms (Google Ads, Meta Ads both have this)
- For email/CRM: Use append services (Clearbit, ZoomInfo) to enrich contact data
- For website: Enable Google Analytics 4 demographics
- Start collecting now; audit in 30 days when you have sufficient data
“My MRI scores are all Critical”
First, understand that MRI (Market Representation Index) measures how well your actual conversions match your target market. Critical scores (<0.70 or >1.30) indicate severe misalignment.
Possible causes:
- Check p-values first: If p-values >0.05, increase sample size before concluding bias
- Your TAM definition may be wrong—verify with market research
- Your targeting is severely biased—if p-values <0.05, immediate action needed
- Sample size too small—ensure you’re using 1,000+ conversions for reliable z-test
- Data quality issue—verify source data accuracy
“My p-values show ‘No’ for statistical significance”
Possible causes:
- Sample size may be too small—collect more data (aim for 1,000+ conversions)
- MRI deviation may be within normal random variation—monitor quarterly
- Your marketing may actually be well-calibrated—great news!
- If MRI is extreme (<0.70) but p>0.05, increase sample and re-test
“I found bias, now what?”
Immediate actions:
- Go to the article, Section “The Four Bias Amplifiers”
- Identify which type of bias you’re seeing (Automation, Data, Confirmation, Survivorship)
- Follow the tactical implementation instructions for your specific tools
- Document in Tab 4
- Re-audit in 30 days to measure improvement
“Leadership won’t prioritize this”
Solution: Use Tab 3 (Revenue Impact Calculator) to show:
- Exact dollar amount at risk
- ROI of fixing the bias (typically 5-10x)
- Comparison to cost of doing nothing
- Present as a growth opportunity, not an ethics issue
Success Metrics
You’re doing it right if:
- You run audits quarterly (or more frequently)
- Your MRI scores improve over time
- You catch and fix bias before it significantly impacts revenue
- Team discusses bias in regular meetings (not just one-off projects)
- Leadership reviews bias metrics alongside other KPIs
Red flags that you’re not:
- Haven’t opened the template in >6 months
- Same bias patterns keep appearing
- No one knows who owns bias audits
- Bias correction is seen as “nice to have” not “must do”
- You’re surprised when a segment complains about exclusion
Advanced Tips
For Google Sheets Users
- File → Make a copy to create your own editable version
- Share with team and set appropriate permissions
- Use Apps Script to automate data imports from ad platforms
- Set up email reminders for quarterly audits
- Create dashboard view using Google Data Studio
For Excel Users
- Enable AutoSave if using OneDrive/SharePoint
- Protect formulas (Review → Protect Sheet) to prevent accidental changes
- Use Power Query to automate data refreshes from APIs
- Create PivotTables in separate sheets for executive dashboards
- Enable Track Changes for team collaboration
Customization
Feel free to:
- Add rows for your specific demographic segments (gender, location, industry, etc.)
- Add additional tabs for channel-specific audits
- Modify the example data to reflect your business
- Adjust MRI thresholds if your industry has unique needs (but keep z-test at p<0.05)
- Adjust default sample size if you consistently analyze larger datasets
- Add your company branding
Do NOT modify:
- Z-test formulas (they’re statistically validated)
- P-value threshold of 0.05 (standard statistical significance level)
Do NOT:
- Delete formula cells (you’ll break calculations)
- Change column orders without updating formulas
- Share with unprotected formulas in production use
Getting Help
Questions?
- About the framework: Read the full article at HackerNoon
- About the template: Contact me
- About your specific bias patterns: Join the discussion in the article comments
Additional Resources
- Full article: How AI-Driven Marketing Amplifies Your Team’s Bias — and How to Fix It
- Part 1: Cognitive Bias Is the New Technical Debt in Marketing
Legal Disclaimer
This template is provided as a diagnostic tool for identifying potential algorithmic bias in marketing systems. It is not legal advice and does not guarantee compliance with any specific regulations (GDPR, CCPA, etc.). Use at your own risk. Dennis Consorte, Consorte Marketing, and associated people and organizations assume no responsibility for any losses incurred by the use of these materials and suggestions.
For questions about legal compliance or if you discover patterns that may violate civil rights laws, consult with legal counsel.
The methodologies in this template are based on the Bias-Debt Framework developed by Dennis Consorte and published on HackerNoon.
